Roast the Post Podcast

Director of First Impressions: Hold for Mr. Draper, Please.

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:18:06 GMT

Let’s Roast.

What do you call a job ad that’s equal parts vague, condescending, and legally dubious? This week’s episode. A wealth management firm is hiring a “Director of First Impressions”… a role that sounds like a leadership position but is actually a receptionist gig with a side of emotional labour, gender bias, and a “work hard, play hard” culture that’s code for “we’ll own your evenings and weekends.” For job seekers, it’s a warning. For hiring managers, it’s a cautionary tale. Buckle up.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do we design job postings that reflect the actual value of administrative work… without resorting to title inflation, gender coding, or cultural red flags? This episode isn’t just a roast; it’s a challenge to rethink how we signal respect, clarity, and sustainability in hiring.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Director of First Impressions
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: Unknown
Industry: Wealth Management
What do they do?: Wealth management firm overseeing approximately $300M in assets under management
Head Office Location: Indian Wells, CA
Job Location: Indian Wells, CA
Geographical Operating Area: Unknown
Job Type: Full-Time, In-Office

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

If you see “Director of First Impressions,” ask: Is this a receptionist role with a fancy title, or does it come with actual leadership responsibilities and pay?
When a job ad uses terms like “bubbly” or “energetic,” ask: Are they describing the work environment, or are they filtering for a specific (and potentially discriminatory) “type”?
If the ad mentions “work hard, play hard,” ask: What does “play” actually entail, and is it mandatory? How will my work-life balance be impacted?
No salary listed? Ask: Why not? And be prepared to negotiate hard or walk away.
If the role blends administrative, sales, and event duties, ask: How will success be measured in each area? And is the compensation fair for the scope?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Issues this posting creates

Legal Risks: Gender-coded language (“bubbly,” “herself”) and ageist terms (“younger office environment”) could expose the firm to discrimination lawsuits.
Title Inflation: Calling a receptionist a “Director” devalues the role, sets unrealistic expectations for candidates, and could harm their future job prospects.
Cultural Red Flags: “Work hard, play hard” signals a lack of boundaries, potential burnout, and a high risk of inappropriate behavior (e.g., mandatory socializing, harassment).
Unclear Expectations: Blending administrative, sales, and event duties without clear priorities or compensation structures leads to role confusion and employee frustration.
Missed Opportunities: Failing to list salary or industry-specific experience (e.g., finance) limits the candidate pool and signals a lack of transparency.

How to address them

Ditch the gendered/ageist language. Describe the work (e.g., “create a welcoming environment for clients”) instead of the personality (e.g., “bubbly”).
Clarify the title and scope. If it’s a receptionist role, call it that, and compensate it fairly. If it’s a hybrid role, define the split of duties and success metrics.
Ban “work hard, play hard.” Replace it with concrete benefits (e.g., “flexible hours,” “professional development budget”) that respect work-life balance.
Post the salary. Transparency builds trust and saves time for everyone.
Specify industry experience. If CRM or finance knowledge is helpful, say so…don’t assume candidates will “figure it out.”

The Verdict

Paul Austin-Menear:
4 / 10 (Job Ad)
1 / 10 (Role Design)

The job ad was okay… in the sense of spelling, grammar, and syntax, anyway. What the job ad communicated though was deeply problematic, and makes me hope that the firm’s misconduct insurance is robust. There will be a harassment lawsuit one day, for sure. The role design was idiotic… they signalled what they want, but what they want didn’t make sense. The requirements were envisioned by someone who doesn’t understand what they need or the human toll it will exact.

Jennifer Houle:
2 / 10 (Job Ad)
0 / 10 (Role Design)

The language they chose for the job ad is really telling, and I just can’t separate it from the things which were positive about the job ad, overall. It’s problematic, and discriminatory… hinting at an underlying culture that is the same. The role design basically guarantees that the person taking this role won’t have a life beyond work and colleagues. Feels a bit like indoctrination. Nasty.

Support the Show

Roast the Post is a passion project of Jennifer Houle and Paul Austin-Menear. The show helps job-seekers and employers get dud job ads out of their lives. There are several ways that you can help us on our mission to unf*ck the hiring process…

1 —> Share this episode with someone who’d like it.

2 —> Pick up a copy of our new e-Book, the Job Description Decoder and leave a review. Proceeds will be donated equally to Ronald McDonald House BC & Yukon and the Toronto Humane Society.

GET THE BOOK

3 —> Send us a one-time or recurring tip on Buy Me a Coffee. This helps pay for our production costs.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Construction Scheduler: Fuh-gantt-aboudit!

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 03 Jul 2026 07:13:01 GMT

Let’s Roast.

This week, we’re roasting a job ad that’s as confusing as Toronto Pearson Airport’s missing Terminal 2. A role buried in jargon, with a title that doesn’t match the responsibilities, and a salary so MIA it might as well be on a delayed flight. For job seekers, it’s a warning. For hiring managers, it’s a lesson in how not to attract talent. Buckle up, this one’s a wild ride.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

Why do organizations treat job postings as an afterthought, when they’re the first impression for both top talent and the public? This isn’t just about clarity, it’s about respect. A well-designed job ad signals a well-designed role, and a well-designed role is the foundation of a functional team. If you can’t articulate what you need, how can you expect to get it?

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Scheduler
Report-to Title: “Your Manager”
Company Size: 10,001+ (Consortium)
Industry: Construction
What do they do?: Special-purpose consortium formed to manage major infrastructure projects at Toronto Pearson International Airport.
Head Office Location: Mississauga, ON, Canada
Job Location: Mississauga, ON, Canada
Geographical Operating Area: Mississauga, ON, Canada
Job Type: Full-Time, Unknown Duration

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

If the job title and responsibilities don’t align, ask: “Which one is the priority—scheduling or project management? And why the discrepancy?”
No salary listed? “What’s the range for this role, and why isn’t it transparent?”
Vague reporting structure? “Who will I report to, and how does this role fit into the larger team?”
Missing benefits or perks? “What’s the full compensation package, including benefits, professional development, and work-life balance?”
High-stakes environment? “What support or resources are in place to ensure success in this role?”

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Issues

Misaligned Title/Responsibilities: Confuses candidates and may deter qualified applicants from applying.
Lack of Transparency: No salary, benefits, or job duration creates distrust and wastes time for both parties.
Poor Role Design: Combining scheduler and project manager duties without clarity risks burnout and inefficiency.
Weak Employer Branding: Fails to sell the organization’s culture, mission, or value proposition.

Outcomes

Missed Talent: Top candidates may overlook or avoid the role due to ambiguity.
High Turnover: Unclear expectations lead to mismatched hires and quick departures.
Reputation Damage: Signals disorganization and lack of respect for candidates’ time.

Fixes

Clarify the Role: Separate scheduler and project manager duties or clearly define the hybrid expectations.
Include Salary & Benefits: Transparency builds trust and attracts serious candidates.
Define Reporting Structure: Candidates need to know their place in the hierarchy and decision-making authority.
Sell the Culture: Highlight what makes the organization unique—mission, values, growth opportunities.

The Verdict

Jennifer Houle:
2 / 10 (Job Ad)
2 / 10 (Role Design)

I’m mad at this job ad. There’s no information in it that describes to the candidate why they should apply or work for this organization. It doesn’t even list a salary, which is a legal requirement for companies of this size regulated by the Province of Ontario.

Paul Austin-Menear:
3 / 10 (Job Ad)
1 / 10 (Role Design)

Total clusterf*ck. Is this actually a Scheduler job, or is it a Project Manager job in disguise? The requirements listed out suggest the latter, but I suspect they’ll try to pay the salary of the former… because it’s lower. The bait-and-switch nature of it pisses me off.

Support the Show

1 —> Share this episode with someone who’d like it.

2 —> Pick up a copy of our new e-Book, the Job Description Decoder and leave a review. Proceeds will be donated equally to Ronald McDonald House BC & Yukon and the Toronto Humane Society.

GET THE BOOK

3 —> Send us a one-time or recurring tip on Buy Me a Coffee. This helps pay for our production costs.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Happiness Engineer: CTRL + ALT + DELIGHT

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 26 Jun 2026 07:07:42 GMT

Let’s Roast.

What if your job was to turn someone’s worst day with a product into a moment of clarity… and maybe even joy? The "Happiness Engineer" role isn’t about forced fun or office parties; it’s a high-stakes, customer-facing gig disguised as a Silicon Valley punchline. For job seekers, it’s a chance to do meaningful work with real autonomy. For hiring managers, it’s a blueprint for how to actually value your support teams. But does the reality live up to the hype? Let’s find out.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a role that keeps customer empathy at the heart of a scaling organization, without letting it become a cost centre or a revolving door? This isn’t just a job posting; it’s a test case for whether companies can truly treat support as a strategic function, not an afterthought.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Happiness Engineer - Customer Support & Success
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: 1,001 - 5,000 Employees
Industry: Software Development
What do they do?: They create software that helps people build websites, sell products online, and manage their digital content.
Head Office Location: San Francisco
Job Location: Remote
Geographical Operating Area: Global
Job Type: Full-Time, Remote

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

Self-scheduled hours sound great… but how do you ensure coverage during peak times, and what happens if my ‘ideal’ hours don’t align with customer demand?
You mention ‘high autonomy’… can you give me a real example of a time a Happiness Engineer made a decision that impacted the product or company direction without needing approval?
The role blends customer support with advocacy. How do you measure success in this role… is it ticket resolution speed, customer satisfaction scores, or something else?
You say support is a long-term career here. Can you share specific examples of Happiness Engineers who’ve grown into leadership or other departments, and what that path looked like?
Global salary ranges sound equitable, but how do you account for cost-of-living differences? For example, how does this salary compare to local market rates for similar roles?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Issues Created:

Ambiguity in Scheduling: Self-scheduled hours could lead to gaps in coverage during peak times, risking customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.
- Outcome: Inconsistent support availability, frustrated customers, and potential burnout for employees covering gaps.
- Fix: Implement a hybrid model… self-scheduled within core hours, with clear expectations for coverage during high-volume periods.
Overpromising Autonomy: Claiming “high autonomy” without defining boundaries may result in employees overstepping or feeling unsupported.
- Outcome: Confusion about decision-making authority, potential conflicts with other teams, and disillusionment if autonomy is limited in practice.
- Fix: Define what autonomy looks like (e.g., process improvements, customer solutions) and where it ends (e.g., product changes require collaboration).
Vague AI Requirements: “AI fluency” is trendy but undefined, risking mismatched expectations between candidates and the role.
- Outcome: Hiring people who either over- or under-deliver on AI capabilities, leading to inefficiencies or missed opportunities.
- Fix: Specify how AI is used in the role (e.g., automating workflows, analyzing customer data) and provide examples of successful applications.
Global Salary Ranges: Paying the same USD amount globally may create inequities in purchasing power and local market competitiveness.
- Outcome: Difficulty attracting top talent in high-cost regions or overpaying in lower-cost areas, leading to retention issues or budget strain.
- Fix: Adjust salary ranges by region or clearly communicate how purchasing power parity is considered.
Lack of Structural Clarity: No reporting structure or team hierarchy is mentioned, which could lead to confusion about career paths and accountability.
- Outcome: Employees may feel adrift in a remote environment, unsure of how to grow or who to turn to for support.
- Fix: Include a brief org chart or describe the team structure (e.g., “Reports to a Customer Experience Lead, with opportunities to collaborate across product and engineering teams”).

The Verdict

Paul Austin-Menear:
9 / 10 (Job Ad)
8 / 10 (Role Design)

One of the best job ads that we’ve ever roasted. The job ad itself was detailed, struck a nice balance between employer branding and what matters for the candidate, and outlined purpose for the organization well. The role design hinted at respect and sustainability, with policies for wellness and fulfillment throughout.

Jennifer Houle:
9 / 10 (Job Ad)
8 / 10 (Role Design)

Absolutely one of the best we’ve ever roasted. If the whole thing wasn’t just window-dressing, many companies could learn from how this ad was structured and the role designed (from what we could tell). A few things were missing, but it was pretty good overall.

Support the Show

1 —> Share this episode with someone who’d like it.

2 —> Pick up a copy of our new e-Book, the Job Description Decoder and leave a review. Proceeds will be donated equally to Ronald McDonald House BC & Yukon and the Toronto Humane Society.

GET THE BOOK

3 —> Send us a one-time or recurring tip on Buy Me a Coffee. This helps pay for our production costs.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Senior Security Manager: Red Card Riot, Football Edition

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 19 Jun 2026 07:03:48 GMT

Let’s Roast.

This isn’t just a job, it’s a three-week pressure cooker. A global football tournament needs a Senior Security Manager to guard everything but the actual games, yet the job ad reads like a Mad Libs reject. With no details on team support, established protocols, or even how you’re supposed to get around Boston’s sprawling suburbs, this role is a masterclass in how not to attract top talent. For candidates, it’s a leap of faith. For hiring managers, it’s a lesson in how vagueness breeds risk.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a high-stakes, short-term security role without creating more chaos than it prevents? This job ad exposes a critical flaw: temporary roles demand more transparency, not less. The lack of structure here isn’t just a hiring problem, it’s a safety liability. If the goal is to protect people and infrastructure, shouldn’t the job description do the same for the person taking the job?

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Senior Security Manager
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: A gajillion, but only every four years
Industry: Sporting Events
What do they do?: Global-level championship tournament for football.
Head Office Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Job Location: Boston, United States
Geographical Operating Area: Global
Job Type: Full-Time, Temporary Contract (Spring/Summer 2026

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

What’s the actual scope? Are you managing a team, or are you a lone wolf? How many sites/venues are you responsible for?
What’s the crisis plan? Are there pre-existing protocols for emergencies, or are you expected to invent them on the fly?
What’s the reporting chain? Who do you answer to, and who answers to you? How does this role interface with competition-venue security?
What’s the real timeline? When does the role start/end? Are there expectations for pre-event planning or post-event wrap-up?
What’s the liability coverage? As a contractor, are you protected if something goes wrong? Who’s on the hook for legal/financial fallout?
What’s the logistical support? Is a vehicle provided? Are travel/accommodation costs covered for non-local hires?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Outcomes of the Ad’s Flaws:

Attracts the wrong candidates: Without clarity, you’ll get applicants who are either overqualified (and will leave frustrated) or underprepared (and will fail).
Wastes time: Interviews will devolve into Q&A sessions about basics the ad should’ve covered.
Legal/operational risks: Vague requirements (e.g., no mention of background checks, vehicle access, or insurance) could lead to compliance gaps or safety oversights.
Reputation damage: A poorly designed ad signals disorganization, deterring top talent from future roles.

How to Fix It:

Partner, don’t DIY: Contract a specialized security firm with existing teams/protocols instead of hiring a solo manager to build everything from scratch.
Clarify the role’s boundaries: Define team size, reporting lines, and collaboration with other security entities (e.g., venue staff, local law enforcement).
Detail the “non-competition” scope: List the types of sites (hotels, training grounds) and their specific security needs.
Address logistics: Specify if a vehicle is required/provided, expected hours, and on-call duties.
Transparency on pay/benefits: Clarify if the per diem is net or gross, and whether contractors are responsible for their own taxes/insurance.
Highlight the “why”: Sell the once-in-a-lifetime experience—access to games, networking opportunities, or resume-boosting prestige.

The Verdict

Jennifer Houle:
5 / 10 (Job Ad)
Cannot Rate (Role Design)

Some of the basics were there for the job ad… it listed requirements and somewhat communicated the skills and background experience this person would need to be successful. But it was missing too much information to score better then a hair-pullingly aggressive “meh”. I couldn’t even rate the role design… they didn’t describe the responsibilities in any depth.

Paul Austin-Menear:
5 / 10 (Job Ad)
Cannot Rate (Role Design)

The information provided in the job ad was about as useful as a spacesuit designed for a turtle. On reflection, this really seemed like a job ad put out publicly to check a box that said “we recruited fairly” when they really had a candidate already lined up. I suspect this was an exercise in futility for anyone who applied to the job ad.

Support the Show

1 —> Share this episode with someone who’d like it.

2 —> Pick up a copy of our new e-Book, the Job Description Decoder and leave a review. Proceeds will be donated equally to Ronald McDonald House BC & Yukon and the Toronto Humane Society.

GET THE BOOK

3 —> Send us a one-time or recurring tip on Buy Me a Coffee. This helps pay for our production costs.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Roast the Post: Happy Hour... Redux

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 12 Jun 2026 07:08:23 GMT

Let’s Roast.

Jen is based in Victoria, Canada. Paul is based in Toronto, Canada. That’s about 3,500km in distance, as the crow flies.

Needless to say, they’re almost never in the same place at the same time. Something really cool happened on April 29th though—the stars aligned, and they were in the same city.

So?

Well, they got together at a pub and held their first ever livestream event—Roast the Post: Happy Hour.

Thanks to everyone who submitted questions ahead of time… there were so many, they didn’t even get through them. In this episode, Jen and Paul circle back to some of the questions that didn’t get answered during the live event.

The Bigger Picture

How do we design hiring processes that respect candidates as humans, not just as resumes in a pipeline? The answer starts with transparency, reciprocity, and tearing down the power imbalances that turn job searches into psychological warfare.

Audience Questions Covered

Emma: How can I ensure I’m not just hiring for skills and experience, but also for cultural fit and long-term alignment with our mission-driven company? I want people who can execute, but also who truly believes in what we’re building. How do I balance those priorities during the interview process?
Alexei: How do I identify companies that genuinely invest in the development of new grads, rather than just using them as cheap labor? I want to find a workplace that values mentorship and long-term growth, but I’m not sure how to spot the red flags during the hiring process.
Jordan: I’m a new recruiter and I have a nightmare client whose requirements make it hard to keep candidates moving through the pipeline to the hiring point. Do you have any advice for pushing back on their requests so I can finish the job? I lose so many great candidates to slow progress…
Sierra: I work in finance and am trying to fill an empty role on my team, but I’m not getting good matches from our HR team. They work in a different office in a different city, and I feel like I’m being ignored. Do you have any advice?
Eliza: I’ve been quietly job hunting for two years with no luck, and had given up. Things turned recently and I have three good offers to choose from. It was so unexpected, I’m overwhelmed. How do I decide what to do?
Taryn: If you were writing a job ad, how would you do it?

Support the Show

1 —> Share this episode with someone who’d like it.

2 —> Pick up a copy of our new e-Book, the Job Description Decoder and leave a review. Proceeds will be donated equally to Ronald McDonald House BC & Yukon and the Toronto Humane Society.

GET THE BOOK

3 —> Send us a one-time or recurring tip on Buy Me a Coffee. This helps pay for our production costs.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Communications Associate: (Musket) Smoke on the Water with Katelyn McArdle

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 05 Jun 2026 07:08:07 GMT

Let’s Roast.

Thanks to special guest roaster, Katelyn McArdle of Functional Authority. You can connect with her on LinkedIn here.

This isn’t just a job ad, it’s a time capsule. A nonprofit wants a Communications Associate to champion Revolutionary War battlefields in the United States… while explicitly banning them from the most powerful communications tool of the 21st century. For job seekers, it’s either a red flag or a dream gig (depending on your tolerance for irony). For hiring managers, it’s a masterclass in how not to design a modern role. Buckle up.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a communications role for the digital age while pretending the digital age doesn’t exist? This job ad forces us to ask: What happens when organizational identity (preserving history) collides with functional reality (needing modern outreach)?

The answer? A role that’s either a quirky labor of love or a cautionary tale about scope creep and cultural misalignment.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Communications Associate
Report-to Title: Director of Communications
Company Size: 11-50 Employees
Industry: Nonprofit Organizations
What do they do?: Acquire and preserve land and historical sites in the United States relevant to the American Revolutionary War, War of 1812, and American Civil War.
Head Office Location: Washington, DC
Job Location: Washington, DC
Geographical Operating Area: United States
Job Type: Permanent, Exempt, Hybrid

For the Job Seekers

If you’re a comms pro: Ask why social media is off-limits. Is there an agency handling it? A cultural aversion? Or just a missed opportunity?
If you love history: Does the mission excite you enough to overlook the role’s lack of creative freedom?
If you’re early-career: Where’s the growth path? This role reports directly to the Director—meaning no ladder, just a ceiling.
If you’re process-driven: Can you thrive in a role that’s heavy on logistics but light on innovation?
If you’re a writer: Are you okay with your words living in newsletters and print ads instead of viral posts?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Outcomes of these mistakes

Attracting the wrong candidates: You’ll get history buffs, not comms strategists—or worse, frustrated hybrids who leave fast.
Burnout: Without clear boundaries, this role risks becoming a catch-all for event planning, grant writing, and donor outreach.
Missed opportunities: Banning social media cuts off a critical channel for engaging younger audiences (who, newsflash, don’t read print ads).
Cultural clash: Demanding “entrepreneurial” energy while enforcing rigid processes will breed resentment.

How to fix it

Clarify the scope: Is this a coordinator role or a strategist role? The title and duties don’t match.
Embrace modern tools: If social media is off-limits, explain why—and redirect that energy into other innovative outreach (podcasts? Partnerships?).
Show the path: No one stays in a dead-end role forever. Outline how this position could grow.
Budget transparency: If this person is managing ad spend or donor pipelines, say how much. A $10K budget vs. a $1M budget changes everything.
Ditch the reference demand: Asking for references upfront is a red flag for candidates. Save it for the offer stage.

The Verdict

Katelyn McArdle:
5 / 10 (Job Ad)
4 / 10 (Role Design)

There was a mismatch between what the job ad communicated that the organization wants, and what it communicated that it needs. There’s some tension there, and it’s unclear at points what they truly are looking for in a Communications Associate.

Jennifer Houle:
7 / 10 (Job Ad)
4 / 10 (Role Design)

I gave them credit on the job ad—it listed a report-to, it clearly described benefits, it clearly described what they were after. The what they were after part was the problem—the role design is sorely lacking. There’s serious misalignment here.

Paul Austin-Menear:
8 / 10 (Job Ad)
5 / 10 (Role Design)

Holy sh*t, there were no typos or written errors. They must have proofread. It’s sad that this makes them stand out… and the job ad itself was pretty good. But the structure of the role? Not so much. Why aren’t they allowing this candidate to interact with what will probably be the most fun part of the job (social media storytelling)? That makes no sense.

Support the Show

1 —> Share this episode with someone who’d like it.

2 —> Pick up a copy of our new e-Book, the Job Description Decoder and leave a review. Proceeds will be donated equally to Ronald McDonald House BC & Yukon and the Toronto Humane Society.

GET THE BOOK

3 —> Send us a one-time or recurring tip on Buy Me a Coffee. This helps pay for our production costs.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Lead VIP Host: The Whale Who Loved Me

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 29 May 2026 07:21:53 GMT

Let’s Roast.

What does it take to keep the whales happy in a high-stakes, high-reward gaming world? This week’s job ad promises autonomy, equity, and a front-row seat to the VIP experience… but at what cost? Whether you’re a job-seeker wondering if you’ve got the charm to pull it off or a hiring manager looking to attract top-tier talent, this episode is your all-access pass to the good, the bad, and the downright risky of this Lead VIP Host role.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a role that balances the extractive nature of monetized gaming with the genuine need for human connection? This job ad forces us to confront the ethics of "whale wrangling" and asks: Can a company truly prioritize both profit and people, or is one always at the expense of the other?

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Lead VIP Host
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: 2-10 employees
Industry: Entertainment Providers
What do they do?: We are on a mission to redefine the skill games category, merging the best from casual play, into real-money adventures to entertain players for decades. AKA: monetized gaming platform with VIP revenue model.
Head Office Location: Jerusalem, Israel
Job Location: Global
Geographical Operating Area: Global
Job Type: Full-Time, Remote

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

Is this role right for me? Do I thrive in high-pressure, always-on environments where my success depends on building deep, personal relationships?
What’s the catch? How does the company define “unlimited vacation” in a role where the whales never sleep?
Am I okay with the ethics? Can I reconcile the extractive nature of this industry with my personal values?
What’s my exit strategy? If this role burns me out, what’s next for my career in gaming or hospitality?
How do I stand out? What unique blend of charisma, analytical skills, and industry experience do I bring to the table?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign.

Outcomes of Mistakes:

Unclear Structure: Without defining how this role fits into a 2–10-person team, you risk hiring someone who can’t scale with your growth—or worse, burns out trying to do it all.
Vague Perks: “Unlimited vacation” and “meaningful equity” sound great, but without concrete details, you may attract candidates who feel misled when reality doesn’t match the promise.
Ethical Blind Spots: Failing to address responsible gambling or the extractive nature of the role could lead to reputational damage or turnover from employees who feel morally conflicted.
Over-Reliance on Autonomy: While autonomy is a perk, without guardrails or support, your VIP Host may struggle to sustain performance—or their well-being.

Suggested Fixes:

Clarify the Org Chart: Even if you’re small, outline how this role interacts with other teams (e.g., analytics, leadership) and what “leading junior hosts” looks like in practice.
Define Perks with Numbers: Specify salary ranges, home office budgets, and how equity works (e.g., vesting schedules, dilution risks).
Address the Elephant in the Room: Acknowledge the ethical complexities of the role and how your company mitigates harm (e.g., responsible gambling tools, “whale” welfare policies).
Design for Sustainability: Build in backup systems (e.g., shared on-call rotations, temporary coverage) to prevent burnout in an always-on role.

The Verdict

Paul Austin-Menear:
7 / 10 (Job Ad)
6 / 10 (Role Design)

The job ad was well-written, easy to follow and understand. Pretty good marks there. They could have improved it with some employer branding and discussion of values. The job structure wasn’t well thought through though. It will hold back the company from growing to their true potential.

Jennifer Houle:
7.5 / 10 (Job Ad)
6.5 / 10 (Role Design)

I found the way that the job ad was written to be very compelling. There was something genuine about it, and I’m into it. So good job there…. but, the job won’t be very sustainable. It should have been structured very differently to bump the odds of success in the house’s favour.

Support the Show

1 —> Share this episode with someone who’d like it.

2 —> Pick up a copy of our new e-Book, the Job Description Decoder and leave a review. Proceeds will be donated equally to Ronald McDonald House BC & Yukon and the Toronto Humane Society.

GET THE BOOK

3 —> Send us a one-time or recurring tip on Buy Me a Coffee. This helps pay for our production costs.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Golf Companion: Singapore Sling, Toronto Swing.

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 22 May 2026 07:17:37 GMT

Let’s Roast.

Ever dreamed of turning your hobby into a six-figure salary? This week’s job ad offers just that… for the right (or wrong) candidate. A wealthy family is hiring a full-time golf companion to travel between Toronto and Singapore, blending coaching, cultural immersion, and a healthy dose of ambiguity. Is this the ultimate gig for a new grad with a finance degree and a love of the links, or a trap disguised as a dream job? Buckle up, this roast is about to take a swing at the 1%.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a role that bridges cultural gaps, professional ambitions, and personal lifestyle… without turning into a logistical disaster or a short-term gimmick? This job ad isn’t seeking a golf companion, it’s seeking a golf companion AND…

Clearly communicating the AND is the key to success or failure.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Golf Companion
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: Unknown
Industry: Family Office
What do they do?: Things. They do things. Presumably. The details of which are murky at best.
Head Office Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Job Location: Toronto, ON, Canada & Singapore
Geographical Operating Area: Unknown
Job Type: Permanent, Full-Time, On-Site

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

Is this role a stepping stone or a dead end? How will this experience translate to my long-term career goals?
What’s the real scope of the job? Am I just a golf coach, or am I expected to be a cultural liaison, chauffeur, or even a business advisor?
How are travel, housing, and visas handled? Will I be stranded in Singapore with no support?
What’s the family’s background? Are they legitimate, or is this a front for something shadier?
Is the salary worth the lifestyle? Can I afford to maintain a home base while traveling 75% of the time?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Issues

Ambiguity in Role Design: The job blends golf coaching, cultural tutoring, and potential business advising without clear boundaries, leading to confusion for candidates.
Lack of Logistical Clarity: No details on travel arrangements, housing, visas, or insurance, which could deter qualified applicants.
Unrealistic Sustainability: The role’s demands (75% travel, no roots) make it unsustainable long-term, risking high turnover.
Trust Gaps: The ad’s vagueness and lack of credibility (e.g., no company details) may raise red flags for candidates about legitimacy or safety.

Fixes

Define the Role Clearly: Separate the golf coaching from cultural/business advisory duties, or explicitly state the blend.
Clarify Logistics: Specify who covers travel, housing, visas, and whether a vehicle is provided (or required).
Address Sustainability: Offer a fixed-term contract (e.g., 2 years) to attract candidates who see it as a temporary adventure.
Build Trust: Include details about the family office’s background, interview process, and support systems (e.g., health insurance, relocation assistance).

The Verdict

Jennifer Houle:
7 / 10 (Job Ad)
5 / 10 (Role Design)

The job ad was pretty clear, though it was missing some important points of clarity. The role design isn’t very sustainable, but maybe that’s okay. This doesn’t strike me as one that would have a long-term employee.

Paul Austin-Menear:
6 / 10 (Job Ad)
6 / 10 (Role Design)

It was just OK, from my perspective. There are certainly some endemic trust issues and the employer is a black box. That will be tough to navigate. This could be a dream job for a new grad, or it could be a nightmare. The devil’s in the details.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Roast the Post is a passion project of Jen Houle and Paul Austin-Menear. The show helps job-seekers and employers get dud job ads out of their lives. We use contributions made on Buy Me a Coffee to help pay for our production costs, and donate anything raised beyond our costs to charity.

Live Studio Audiences

Paul Austin-Menear — Wed, 20 May 2026 15:46:18 GMT

Regular episodes of Roast the Post are recorded in a virtual studio, generally on Friday afternoons. You can join us and watch the episode being recorded as we go—hilarious outtakes and all. During the show intermission, we chat with the audience and take questions =)

Getting your invitation to join our studio audience is free, and there are only a few simple steps:

Why do you need to follow both of us?

Like every good partnership, we share the work equitably. Jen and Paul alternate weeks hosting the show, and invitations to join the live studio session are sent from the host’s account.

Subscribe now

Product Designer: Worshipping at the Altar of Figma

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 15 May 2026 07:10:13 GMT

Let’s Roast.

Healthcare is broken. This company wants to fix it… by hiring a product designer to ‘stretch themselves’ under tight deadlines, absorb endless feedback, and ‘own’ a role with no clear responsibilities. Oh, and they’ll pay you $100K–$115K (if you’re lucky) and don’t mention benefits. Jen and Paul dig into a job ad that’s all mission, no clarity, and a masterclass in how not to attract top talent.

Is this the future of design work, or just another hustle culture bait-and-switch?

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a job for impact when the system is broken… and your own company is part of the problem?

This episode isn’t just about a flawed job ad; it’s about the tension between mission-driven work and exploitative expectations. If a company wants to “redefine healthcare,” it should start by redesigning its own hiring practices: clear responsibilities, fair compensation, and transparency about culture and support. Otherwise, it’s just another startup burning out designers in the name of “urgency.”

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Product Designer
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: 201 - 500 employees
Industry: Hospitals and Healthcare
What do they do?: Connect patients and families with dedicated healthcare advocates (like nurses and care specialists) who guide them through the healthcare system to improve outcomes and ensure they don’t fall through the cracks.
Head Office Location: Redwood City, California
Job Location: Remote, US
Geographical Operating Area: USA
Job Type: Full-Time

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

What’s the real workload? Ask: “How many projects will I own simultaneously, and what’s the average timeline for feedback cycles?”
Who’s in the room? Clarify: “Who will I report to, and who else will be giving me feedback on my designs?”
What’s the growth path? Probe: “How does the company support professional development or promotions?”
Where’s the safety net? Demand: “What benefits (healthcare, retirement, etc.) are included, and how do they align with your mission?”

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Problem: Unrealistic expectations – Demanding “unrealistic timelines” and “pixel-perfect” work under ambiguity risks burnout and high turnover. Fix: Define clear priorities, realistic deadlines, and feedback loops. If speed is critical, explain why and how it aligns with long-term goals.
Problem: Lack of transparency – No benefits, reporting structure, or team details signal disorganization or a toxic culture. Fix: Include these basics in every job ad. Candidates (especially in mission-driven fields) need to trust you’ll support them as much as they support your mission.
Problem: Bias in hiring – Requiring video applications excludes introverts, neurodivergent candidates, and those without resources to produce polished content. Fix: Replace with structured written responses or asynchronous interviews. Focus on skills, not presentation.
Problem: Mission misalignment – A bold mission loses credibility if the company doesn’t “walk the walk” (e.g., no healthcare benefits for a healthcare company). Fix: Audit your employee experience. Does it reflect your external mission? If not, fix it before hiring.

The Verdict

Paul Austin-Menear:
5 / 10 (Job Ad)
Could Not Rate (Role Design)

I hated having to give the job ad this rating, because there was such alignment to purpose and so much was great about it. Too much was missing though, it was half finished. I couldn’t even rate the role design because there was so little about the role beyond fluffy hype words about making things beautiful.

Jennifer Houle:
5 / 10 (Job Ad)
Could Not Rate (Role Design)

The job ad is halfway there, with a LOT of missing pieces. They’re passionate about healthcare, but don’t even appear to offer health insurance to their employees. WTF? The role design was MIA. So, yeah.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Director of Pedagogy: Peda... goo-goo? With Chief Absurdist Officer

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 08 May 2026 07:05:10 GMT

Let’s Roast.

What happens when a job ad asks for a "Director of Pedagogy" but really wants a jack-of-all-trades, master of none? This week, Jen, Paul, and special guest Chief Absurdist Officer (Kathi Eric Dalguntas) tear into a role that’s part teacher, part salesperson, part project manager… and 100% a hot mess. With a salary that’s more insult than offer and responsibilities that defy logic, this job ad is a cautionary tale for both job seekers and the companies that create them. Buckle up… this roast is heavy on charcoal crusting.

Follow along with the full job ad here :

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a role that balances expertise, scalability, and human limitations? This episode isn’t just about a bad job ad… it’s about the systemic failure to recognize that roles must be built for real people, not wish lists. When companies demand everything from one person, they set up both the employee and the organization for failure. The real question: How can we shift from “do more with less” to “design for success”?

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Director of Pedagogy, e-Learning Instructional Design
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: 51-200 employees
Industry: E-Learning Providers
What do they do?: Leverage advanced technology to provide personalized, industry-leading language learning ecosystems for K-12, higher education, and corporate environments.
Head Office Location: Toronto, ON
Job Location: Remote, Canada
Geographical Operating Area: Global
Job Type: Full-Time

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

What’s the real priority here? Ask: “Which of these responsibilities is most critical to success in the first 90 days?”
Who’s on my team? Clarify: “Can you describe the team structure and who I’d be collaborating with most closely?”
Why is this role open? Probe: “Is this a new role, or am I replacing someone? If so, why did they leave?”
How is success measured? Demand: “What does success look like in this role, and how will it be evaluated?”
What’s the culture like? Investigate: “How does the company support work-life balance and professional development?”

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Role Overload: The job ad crams instructional design, sales support, project management, and cultural sensitivity into one role. Outcome: Burnout, high turnover, and poor performance. Fix: Split the role into 2-3 focused positions or clearly prioritize responsibilities.
Lack of Clarity: No reporting structure, vague expectations, and no cultural hooks. Outcome: Confusion, misalignment, and difficulty attracting top talent. Fix: Define the role’s purpose, reporting lines, and success metrics upfront.
Salary Insult: $70K–$80K CAD for a “Director” role with global responsibilities. Outcome: Low-quality applicants or rapid attrition. Fix: Benchmark salaries competitively and be transparent about compensation philosophy.
Cultural Red Flags: Glassdoor reviews cite toxicity and lack of vision. Outcome: Reputation damage and difficulty retaining talent. Fix: Address cultural issues publicly and align job ads with real employer branding.

The Verdict

Chief Absurdist Officer:
3 / 10 (Job Ad)
4 / 10 (Role Design)

It’s hollow, and it’s a Frankenstein job. The ad was poorly written, and the role design suffered from a lack of thought and foresight. Booooooo.

Paul Austin-Menear:
3 / 10 (Job Ad)
2 / 10 (Role Design)

Brutal job description, brutal role design. The only candidate who could actually do this job as described, without melting into a puddle on day one, is Sam Altman’s Claude-enabled Chia Pet. He wouldn’t even want ChatGPT to touch this one.

Jennifer Houle:
1 / 10 (Job Ad)
1 / 10 (Role Design)

This one hurt my brain. It makes me want to redesign our scoring system so that I can give them a participation ribbon instead of a score. There’s nothing of merit in this.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Roast the Post LIVE: Happy Hour

Paul Austin-Menear — Tue, 05 May 2026 16:07:00 GMT

Let’s Roast.

Jen is based in Victoria, Canada. Paul is based in Toronto, Canada. That’s about 3,500km in distance, as the crow flies.

Needless to say, they’re almost never in the same place at the same time. Something really cool happened last week though—the stars aligned, and they were in the same city. Catch the replay on your favourite podcast app or watch on YouTube or Substack.

The Bigger Picture

Audience Questions Covered

Kathi: In a better world, what would the jobseeker’s experience look like if you could have it your way?
Sam: When an HR employee asks about your salary expectations during a job interview, is it a good idea to say how much you currently make? What if they offer you lower than your current wage? General negotiation tips?
Max: What to do if you get lowballed?
Max: How do interviewers measure “cultural fit”?
Max: Should I say the true reason I’m leaving my current job (toxic)?
Max: What if I mess up during an interview?
Mike: Thoughts on digital nomads and remote work?
Sam: Length of typical hiring process?
Sam: Thoughts on letting employees push out their start date or do they need to start immediately?

Did Jen and Paul cover all of the questions submitted by the audience live or in advance? Not even close. Stay tuned for a special session where they tackle the rest from the studio.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

VP, Enterprise Sales: The Scorpion and the Frog at the River

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 01 May 2026 07:11:46 GMT

Let’s Roast.

What does it say about an organization when its VP of Sales role reads like a Wall Street boiler room job… but for nonprofits? This week, Jen and Paul dissect a job ad that demands $25M in new revenue, a 40-person team, and a compensation package so opaque it might as well be written in invisible ink. But the real womp-womp? The company’s mission is to make giving easier for charities. So why does this role feel like it’s designed to burn out its leader, and what does that mean for the causes they claim to serve? Buckle up: this roast is equal parts eye-opening and infuriating.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a high-stakes sales role for an organization whose mission is philanthropy, without turning it into a zero-sum game? This job ad exposes the tension between revenue growth and ethical responsibility, forcing us to ask:

Can capitalism and charity coexist in a single role? And if so, which thumb is on the scale?

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Vice President, Enterprise Sales
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: 201-500
Industry: Software Development — Fundraising Software
What do they do?: Donation platform helping nonprofits engage more supporters and grow revenue by providing easy ways to increase conversion, enable modern payment methods, and personalize the giving experience for every donor.
Head Office Location: Brooklyn, New York
Job Location: Remote (USA)
Geographical Operating Area: Global
Job Type: Full-Time / Permanent

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

What’s the real base salary? The ad only lists “on-target earnings”. How much of that is guaranteed, and how much is variable based on performance?
Who do you actually report to? No reporting structure is listed… how will you navigate authority and decision-making?
How will you manage 40+ direct reports? The ad mentions coaching and retention, but is that even possible without burning out?
What are the ethical guardrails? With revenue incentives this aggressive, how do you ensure alignment with the nonprofit’s mission?
What’s the turnover rate for sales positions on the team? If retention is a listed responsibility, what’s the history here? What are some of the historical challenges?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Issues:

Lack of Transparency: Bundling compensation as “on-target earnings” without clarifying base salary is deceptive and could deter top talent.
Unrealistic Span of Control: Managing 40+ direct reports is unsustainable, expect high turnover or poor performance.
Ethical Misalignment: Aggressive revenue targets in a nonprofit context risk reputational damage and mission drift.
Authority Ambiguity: No clarity on reporting structure or decision-making power leaves the role powerless to enact change.

Fixes:

Restructure the Team: Break the 40+ reports into smaller units with clear leadership layers.
Clarify Compensation: List base salary, bonus structure, and equity (if applicable) upfront.
Define Ethical Guardrails: Explicitly outline how revenue goals align with the nonprofit’s mission.
Add Outcomes to the Job Ad: Specify what success looks like in 3, 6, and 12 months… not just revenue targets.

The Verdict

Jennifer Houle:
7.5 / 10 (Job Ad)
5 / 10 (Role Design)

The job ad was fairly well-written, though missing some important nuance for a VP-level role in a serious organization. The role design… worried me. This person is going to be constantly battling competing management priorities all while being compensated mostly based on revenue targets.

Paul Austin-Menear:
4 / 10 (Job Ad)
5 / 10 (Role Design)

It all sucked. The ethical conflict in the incentive structures were brutal. The job ad was missing honesty around earnings, and squished together a bunch of incompatible expectations. The role design… well, you might be able take your first week of vacation in around the year 2061. Like, come on.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Senior Manager, Partner Success: The CPG Hunger Games

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 24 Apr 2026 07:08:19 GMT

Let’s Roast.

Ever seen a job ad that reads like a founder’s wishlist for their own clone? This week, we roast a Senior Manager, Partner Success role that’s equal parts sales, operations, event planning, and team leadership… all for a startup so small, the “team” might not even exist yet. The problem? Scaling by duplication doesn’t work. It amplifies your strengths and your gaps, and this role is a masterclass in how not to design a job. Tune in to hear why this “player-coach” gig is a one-way ticket to burnout, and what hiring managers (and job seekers) should watch out for.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a role for growth without defaulting to “hire another me”?
This episode exposes a common scaling trap: founders who try to replicate themselves instead of building complementary teams. The result? Roles that are unsustainable, demoralizing, and destined for turnover. The real challenge isn’t finding someone who can do it all, it’s designing systems and teams that can outlast the founder’s personal bandwidth.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Senior Manager, Partner Success
Report-to Title: Head of Partnerships
Company Size: 2-10 Employees
Industry: Industry Associations
What do they do?: Build and support the ecosystem behind new and emerging consumer packaged goods brands—the organization provides partnership, networking, training, and development opportunities for startups in this space.
Head Office Location: New York, NY
Job Location: Remote (US)
Geographical Operating Area: North America
Job Type: Full-Time, Permanent

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

Is this role actually “senior,” or just a fancy title for a jack-of-all-trades?
What’s the real team structure? Are you walking into a one-person show?
How will success be measured? (Hint: If it’s “do everything,” run.)
What’s the travel really like? Will you need a car, or is expensing an Uber going to be your new hobby?
Is the salary competitive for the workload, or are you being asked to build the plane while flying it?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign.

Issues this job posting creates:

Unrealistic workload: Combining sales, ops, events, and team leadership in one role guarantees burnout.
Lack of clarity: Vague team structure and reporting lines create confusion and inefficiency.
Scaling by cloning: Hiring someone just like you amplifies your blind spots and limits growth.
Travel without support: 20-30% travel with no mention of logistics (car, equipment, etc.) is a recipe for surprises.

How to fix it:

Split the role: Divide responsibilities into distinct functions (e.g., sales, ops, events) to avoid overload.
Define the team: Be transparent about who exists, who you’re hiring, and what the org chart looks like.
Hire for gaps: Identify what you’re not good at and find someone who excels there.
Clarify travel expectations: Specify requirements (car, lifting, etc.) upfront to avoid mismatches.

The Verdict

Jennifer Houle:
7 / 10 (Job Ad)
5 / 10 (Role Design)

The job ad wasn’t bad… I’ve seen worse. I’ve seen better, but I’ve seen worse. There was some duplication of information—for instance, why did we restate the desired qualifications in a different section? The role design was a bit of a furpile though. Too many conflicting responsibilities that didn’t overlap well. This one will end in burnout or dropped balls.

Paul Austin-Menear:
8 / 10 (Job Ad)
6 / 10 (Role Design)

The job ad was nicely structured. Easy to read, no typos, clear language. The person who wrote it obviously sat down and thought about how they were doing to frame what they wanted. Unfortunately, what it seems that they want is a clone of themself. This screams Founder-wearing-all-the-hats, which isn’t going to work out so well for a staff hire (even if titled at a senior level).

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Live Event - Roast the Post: Happy Hour

Paul Austin-Menear — Tue, 21 Apr 2026 15:37:00 GMT

Happy hour is better with friends. Tap the button below to send this invitation along to yours!

Open-Access, Ask Us Anything

Jen is based in Victoria, Canada. Paul is based in Toronto, Canada.

That’s about 3,500km in distance, as the crow flies.

Needless to say, they’re almost never in the same place at the same time. Something really cool is happening next week though—the stars aligned, and they’ll both be in the same city.

And, they’re meeting up at a pub over happy hour to host a special livestream AMA event to answer your questions on searching for a job, designing better roles, writing better job ads, and anything in between.

Roast the Post: Happy Hour
April 29, 2026
5:30pm Eastern Daylight Time (1730 UTC-4)

You should tag along! Here’s the link to add the livestream to your calendar or join during the session:

JOIN LIVESTREAM

Even better, submit a question ahead of time (especially if you can’t make it but want to watch the recap—yup, that will be sent out a day or so after the event).

SUBMIT QUESTION

See you there! =)

Specialist, Safety: Behind the Lockbox

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 17 Apr 2026 07:11:37 GMT

Let’s Roast.

Ever wonder who cleans up after the worst-case scenarios in short-term rentals? This week, Jen and Paul roast a “Safety Specialist” job ad that’s less about support and more about offloading trauma onto underpaid, overworked employees. From the lack of training references to the lowball salary, this role is a glaring example of how tech companies outsource their darkest problems… without providing the resources to match. If you’ve ever stayed in a rental (or hosted one), this episode will make you question the system.

Follow along with the full job ad here:

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a role for managing extreme human crises without replicating the systemic failures that created the need for it? This episode isn’t just a roast, it’s a commentary on the ethical limits of outsourcing risk.

For hiring managers, this is a wake-up call: human trauma isn’t a line item.

For job seekers, it’s a reminder: your personal wellbeing isn’t a corporate subsidy.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Specialist, Safety
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: 5,001-10,000 Employees
Industry: Software Development
What do they do?: Online marketplace that connects people looking for short-term accommodations or unique travel experiences with local hosts who have space to rent.
Head Office Location: San Francisco, CA
Job Location: Remote (Canada)
Geographical Operating Area: Global
Job Type: Full-Time, Permanent

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

What mental health and trauma support does this company provide, and is it virtually accessible alongside in-person resources?
How is this role structured within the team? Will I be isolated or part of a dedicated unit?
What’s the career path for someone in this role? How do you support employees in preventing burnout?
How does the company measure success here? Is it resolution rates, speed, or something else?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Issues:

Lack of Transparency: The ad fails to outline training, team structure, or long-term support, which guarantees high turnover and poor outcomes.
Misaligned Compensation: Paying less than public sector emergency roles for equivalent (or worse) trauma exposure is unsustainable and unethical.
Structural Overload: Combining crisis response, process documentation, and training into one role suggests a missing layer of management… and a recipe for failure.

Outcomes:

High attrition, leading to constant rehiring and lost institutional knowledge.
Poor crisis response, as under-supported employees burn out or disengage.
Reputational risk, as stories of mishandled cases leak to the public or media.

Fixes:

Invest in specialized training and certifications for trauma response, not just generic customer service skills.
Create a tiered support system, with clear escalation paths and dedicated mental health resources.
Pay competitively: this isn’t a typical call centre gig, it’s a high-stakes safety function.
Be honest about the role’s demands in the ad, including the emotional toll and required resilience.

The Verdict

Paul Austin-Menear:
6 / 10 (Job Ad)
2 / 10 (Role Design)

The job ad was OK-adjacent. It included all of the required things, but was light on some important details. The role design though…. atrocious. This role design just screams plug-and-play-humans, we-don’t-care-when-people-burn-out-or-get-PTSD. They should be ashamed of themselves.

Jennifer Houle:
3 / 10 (Job Ad)
3 / 10 (Role Design)

Very little was redeeming about this. The job ad as written was haphazard, like they just gave up part-way through writing it. And the role design, well, it’s basically a signboard that says “apply for this job if you want to develop severe mental health struggles.” This is a global company that’s extremely profitable, and yet, they’re leaving the people in this role hanging.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Lecturer in Law: Last Lap for Tenure Track with Dr. Sam Illingworth

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 10 Apr 2026 07:04:51 GMT

Let’s Roast.

Ever wonder what it’s like to land a tenure-track job in the UK? Spoiler: It’s not all ivy-covered walls and intellectual freedom. This week, Dr. Sam Illingworth of SlowAI joins Jen and Paul to dissect a “Lecturer in Law” job ad that demands “excellence” but offers little support in return—no career roadmap, no training for pastoral care, and a salary that sort of keeps up with the cost of living. For job seekers, this is a cautionary tale. For universities, it’s a wake-up call.

Follow along with the full job ad here :

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How can universities design roles that actually support the people who keep them running? This episode isn’t just a roast, it’s a blueprint for rethinking academic labour. What if we measured success by student retention and teaching quality, not just research grants? What if pastoral care wasn’t an afterthought, but a priority? The answers could reshape higher education and a broad swath of society.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Lecturer in Law (Teaching and Scholarship)
Report-to Title: Unknown
Company Size: 5,001 - 10,000
Industry: Higher Education
What do they do?: Undergraduate and Graduate level programs, basic research, and other things worthy of taxpayer funding.
Head Office Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Job Location: Cardiff, Wales, UK
Geographical Operating Area: United Kingdom
Job Type: Full-Time (35h/wk), Open-Ended (On-Site)

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

What does “excellence” mean here, and how will I be supported to achieve it?
How does this role align with my long-term career goals, and what’s the advancement path at this institution?
What training or resources are available for pastoral care, given its importance and central role to the fabric of the society at the university?
What’s the real teaching load, and how much time is left for scholarship?
How is excellent in teaching evaluated, and how does that relate to opportunities for advancement at the university?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Issues:
- Unclear Metrics: “Excellence” is demanded but undefined, leading to subjective evaluations and potential bias.
- Pastoral Care Gap: The role requires emotional labour but offers no training or support, risking burnout and high turnover.
- Incentive Misalignment: Teaching and research are lumped together, diluting focus and undermining both.
- Lack of Transparency: No clear career progression or professional development plan is provided, which may deter top candidates.
Outcomes & Fixes:
- Outcome: High attrition, disillusioned hires, and a reputation for poor work-life balance.
- Fix: Define “excellence” with concrete metrics and provide structured career pathways.
- Outcome: Pastoral care becomes a liability rather than a strength, harming student well-being.
- Fix: Invest in training and resources for faculty mental health support.
- Outcome: Teaching is undervalued, leading to lower student satisfaction and retention.
- Fix: Separate teaching and research tracks, with equal incentives for both.

The Verdict

Jennifer Houle:
7 / 10 (Job Ad)

I would have liked to see more about supports. If they want you to be excellent in this role… how will they empower and support you to do that? It was a bit thin on details on that front.

Paul Austin-Menear:
8 / 10 (Job Ad)
6 / 10 (Role Design)

The job ad itself was well-structured, though overly verbose in places. The role design was a bit more troubling for me… some of the most important responsibilities seem to be cases of “go figure it out yourself”, whereas the societal stakes are quite high.

Dr. Sam Illingworth:
7.5 / 10 (Job Ad)
7.5 / 10 (Role Design)

For a job ad of this nature in academia, it was about average. They separated out teaching and research as distinct practice areas, which was good, but there were scant details and metrics that communicated what excellence is and how this lecturer will be evaluated.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Special: Jen and Paul Write a Job Ad (Update)

Paul Austin-Menear — Tue, 07 Apr 2026 07:04:37 GMT

Let’s Roast.

What if the problem isn’t your candidate pool, but your job title?

In this experimental episode, Jen and Paul co-design a role in real time and uncover how language, structure, and transparency can either attract the right systems thinker… or flood you with the wrong applicants. If you care about inclusive hiring, operational clarity, and not herding cats forever, this one’s for you.

UPDATE: Jen sent an offer out to a candidate who went through this hiring process. This bonus episode captures some outcomes, and her thoughts on the process and the restructured job ad. You can catch the original episode where we picked apart her job ad here.

Follow along with the full job ad here :

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a job ad that signals autonomy, inclusivity, and operational ownership… without drowning in volume or ambiguity?

This episode reframes hiring as a systems design challenge: the job post isn’t a formality, it’s the first operational blueprint for the role.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Executive Assistant —> Operations Coordinator
Report-to Title: VP, People Operations
Company Size: 10-20
Industry: Venture Capital
What do they do?: Invest in small-to-medium-sized majority Indigenous-owned enterprises across North America.
Head Office Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Job Location: Remote (Canada)
Geographical Operating Area: North America
Job Type: Full-Time, Permanent (Remote)

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Director, Compliance Operations: Between a Rock and a Regulator

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 03 Apr 2026 07:07:37 GMT

Let’s Roast.

What happens when your job is to say “no” to the people whose job is to say “yes”? This week, Paul and Jen tackle a Director of Compliance Operations role where the reporting structure is a minefield, the salary is a sick joke, and the expectations are sky-high. For job seekers, this is a cautionary tale about the cost of ethical tension. For hiring managers, it’s a blueprint for how not to design a critical role. Listen in to find out why this job ad is a case study in systemic dysfunction… and why the best candidates will run the other way.

Follow along with the full job ad here :

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a compliance role that actually works? This episode isn’t just about roasting a job ad… it’s about the fundamental tension between profit and principle in financial services. The real question: Can a role like this ever succeed when its structure guarantees conflict? For organizations, the answer lies in clarity, authority, and compensation that reflects the true value (and risk) of the work.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Director, Compliance Operations
Report-to Title: CCO & CAMLO (dual-reporting)
Company Size: 1,001 - 5,000
Industry: Financial Services
What do they do?: Personal loans, Home Improvement Loans, Debt Consolidation, Mortgage, Consumer Financing, Automobile Financing, and Retail point-of-sale Financing
Head Office Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Job Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Geographical Operating Area: Canada
Job Type: Full-Time, Permanent (On-Site)

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

How will I navigate conflicting directives from two bosses with opposing goals?
What does “entrepreneurial” mean in a compliance role, and is that a red flag for a role that exists to mitigate risk?
How many people am I actually managing, and what support will I have?
Is there a progression path here, or is this a dead-end role?
How is the performance bonus calculated, and what metrics am I being judged on?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign.

Issues:

Dual reporting creates paralysis: Without clear final decision-making authority, the role is set up for gridlock, especially when commercial and compliance goals clash.
Ambiguous acronyms and responsibilities: Unclear language (CCO = Chief Commercial Officer or Chief Compliance Officer?) and vague tech/people management expectations risk attracting the wrong candidates, or scaring off the right ones.
Salary misalignment: A $120K–$150K range for a high-stakes, high-responsibility role in Toronto is under-market and signals undervaluation of risk mitigation.
No career progression: The lack of intermediate roles between Director and C-suite means top talent will stagnate or leave.

Fixes:

Clarify the reporting structure: Assign a single final decision-maker to resolve conflicts and streamline accountability.
Define “entrepreneurial” in compliance: Replace buzzwords with concrete expectations—compliance requires rigor, not risk-taking.
Adjust compensation: Benchmark against industry standards for similar roles in high-cost cities, and tie bonuses to measurable risk mitigation outcomes.
Add career ladders: Create senior director or VP-level roles to give high performers a path forward.

The Verdict

Jennifer Houle:
8 / 10 (Job Ad)
5 / 10 (Role Design)

The job ad was nicely structured, and contains a lot of information. They included a salary range and mandatory disclosures, unlike many organizations. The role design is a different story though… poorly thought through, with an ambiguous reporting structure and nightmarish power dynamics. This person will burn out because of how the role was designed.

Paul Austin-Menear:
7 / 10 (Job Ad)
5 / 10 (Role Design)

The job advert itself was easy to navigate and contained all of the information I’d need to decide if I was going to apply. So, good marks there—though I took a few points off for including irrelevant information and perks that wouldn’t apply to the successful candidate. The role design was a struggle. This person will be stretched thin, and won’t be properly compensated for the importance of their work in relation to the value it creates for the org.

SUPPORT THE SHOW

Dog Nanny & Household Coordinator: Trust Falls and Dog Balls

Paul Austin-Menear — Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:14:40 GMT

Let’s Roast.

What happens when a job ad reads like a cross between a fairy tale and a legal minefield? This week, Jen and Paul dissect a “Dog Nanny & Household Coordinator” role that’s equal parts heartwarming and head-scratching. The ultra-wealthy owner wants someone to love their poodles (we’re assuming they’re poodles) as much as they do.

But they forgot to include critical details like salary, work-life balance, or what happens when Fefe throws a tantrum. Whether you’re a job seeker wondering if this is a dream gig or a hiring manager curious about the pitfalls of “vibes-based” recruitment for a private family office, this episode is a must-listen.

Follow along with the full job ad here :

VIEW DOCUMENT

The Bigger Picture

How do you design a role that balances flexibility with fairness, especially when the stakes involve someone’s beloved pets and personal space? This episode isn’t just about roasting a quirky job ad, it’s a case study in the risks of blending professional and personal boundaries, and the importance of clarity in job design. For employers, it’s a reminder that even the most unique roles need structure. For job seekers, it’s a lesson in spotting red flags disguised as perks.

At a Glance: The Job Profile

Job Title: Dog Nanny & Household Coordinator
Report-to Title: unknown
Company Size: N/A
Industry: Private Family Office
What do they do?: Private Family Office
Head Office Location: Collingwood, ON
Job Location: Collingwood, ON
Geographical Operating Area: N/A
Job Type: Flexible

For the Job Seekers

Did you come across a job ad like this? These questions might help you shed some light on what working there is really like:

What’s the real cost of “flexibility”? Are you prepared to sacrifice weekends, holidays, and personal plans for a role with no set schedule?
How do you assess trust and safety in a live-in or overnight role? What guardrails should be in place to protect both you and the employer?
Would you take a job without a listed salary? How would you negotiate compensation for a role this unpredictable?
What’s your exit strategy? If the dogs (or the owner) turn out to be high-maintenance, how do you gracefully bow out?

For the Job-Seeker Seekers

Are you writing a job ad for a similar role? Consider these hidden issues that might impact the success of your recruitment campaign:

Problem: The role’s lack of structure and salary transparency will deter qualified candidates and attract those desperate for any opportunity. Outcome: High turnover, potential legal risks (e.g., disputes over hours, living arrangements), and difficulty finding the right fit. Fix: Define clear expectations, offer competitive compensation, and consider splitting the role into two (e.g., a dog walker + a household manager) to widen the talent pool.
Problem: The “no pets” preference limits candidates and could open the door to discrimination claims. Outcome: Fewer applicants, possible legal challenges, and a role that feels exclusionary. Fix: Focus on skills and compatibility with the dogs, not arbitrary pet ownership rules.
Problem: Relying on “vibes” over qualifications makes hiring subjective and risky. Outcome: Biased hiring decisions and potential mismatches. Fix: Use structured interviews and trial periods to assess fit objectively.

The Verdict

Paul Austin-Menear:
5 / 10 (Job Ad)
4 / 10 (Role Design)

There was some good stuff in the job ad that I liked… talk of trust-based relationships, a sense of agency and the feeling that the duties are outcomes-based instead of responsibilities-based. Good have been more description. The role design was a big flop though. Too many assumptions, too many filters, and too many questions… especially about liability if one of the dogs gets sick or injured.

Jennifer Houle:
7 / 10 (Job Ad)
4 / 10 (Role Design)

Salary information was missing from the job ad. Even if not required, that’s a red flag… especially when it will obviously involve personal sacrifice. But, it was a well-written ad. It was clear, concise, and honest about what they want. The role design was a challenge though, and ultimately I think the role design will hold this back.

SUPPORT THE SHOW